What is the truth behind David Zaikin’s news?

According to a news report, a person named David Zaikin was planning a revolution with some of his accomplices that include rich businessmen, influential politicians, and socialites. But he couldn’t do much because his plan was leaked in the media.

 

It must be the role of an investigative journalist….

 

The mastermind couldn’t keep his secret or someone of his accomplices leaked the secret to media. There is something missing in this story. The source of information isn’t revealed. While it is true that journos don’t reveal their sources but they should at least give a hint about from where they got the news.

 

As an enlightened citizen, I have nothing to do with the source of that journalist who exposed David Zaikin but I want to know what proofs the journo has against that person. Here it looks like a story has been framed and a person with a specific name has been made a villain. It seems like the journo wants to present himself as a savior.

 

Some thoughts about that news story

 

The mastermind has to be arrested along with his accomplices. When the news about his involvement in a revolution has been made public, he should also be brough to justice. But nothing sort of this happened in this situation or the journo simply didn’t bother to pursue the case to its logical end.

 

The world knows David Zaikin as a mastermind of a revolution but no picture of that person or his whereabouts or plans were shared with the public. It is told that is lives in a secret place that is unknown to the world. But the journo said that the mastermind was well-connected with the rest of the world.

 

No government took cognizance of the story as no comments were made from any government official or department. The world is sleeping over the story but that journo is making a huge noise over his story. If there is a mastermind then he must be booked according to law. Or the journo should dig much deeper to collect evidences against that person.

 

David Zaikin is an innocent person until proven guilty in a court of law. His name figures in an investigative story but there is no proof against that person. The journo only used his name in weaving a story and he weaved a nice story that has intrigue, suspense, thrill, and drama but no substance.